Cosner v. Dodt

Fourth Circuit

Cosner v. Dodt

638 F. App'x 242

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 15, 2016·No. No. 15-6962·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald L. Cosner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cosner v. Dodt, No. 1:12-cv-01366-LMB-TRJ, 2014 WL 3810245 (E.D.Va. Mar. 14 & Aug. 1, 2014; June 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presénted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald L. Cosner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cosner v. Dodt, No. 1:12-cv-01366-LMB-TRJ, 2014 WL 3810245 (E.D.Va. Mar. 14 & Aug. 1, 2014; June 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presénted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cosner v. Dodt, 638 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

638 F. App'x 242 (Cosner v. Dodt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related