Cosnahan v. Rowland

99 Ga. 285
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 3, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

According to the principle laid down by this court in the cases of Cleghorn v. Johnson, 69 Ga. 369, and Wimberly v. Mansfield, 70 Ga. 783, there was no error upon the trial of a claim case in refusing to admit in evidence in behalf of the claimant, Who was claiming as the head of a family under an alleged homestead, an established copy of proceedings to set the same apart, it appearing that the order establishing such copy was granted by the ordinary while the claim case was pending and without notice to the plaintiff in execution.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cosnahan v. Rowland, 99 Ga. 285 (Ga. 1896).

99 Ga. 285 (Cosnahan v. Rowland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salter v. Salter
60 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Humphrey v. Johnson
79 S.E. 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Selph v. Selph
72 S.E. 31 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Cosnahan v. Johnston
33 S.E. 847 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)