Cosnahan v. Rowland

99 Ga. 285
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 3, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 99 Ga. 285 (Cosnahan v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cosnahan v. Rowland, 99 Ga. 285 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

According to the principle laid down by this court in the cases of Cleghorn v. Johnson, 69 Ga. 369, and Wimberly v. Mansfield, 70 Ga. 783, there was no error upon the trial of a claim case in refusing to admit in evidence in behalf of the claimant, Who was claiming as the head of a family under an alleged homestead, an established copy of proceedings to set the same apart, it appearing that the order establishing such copy was granted by the ordinary while the claim case was pending and without notice to the plaintiff in execution.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salter v. Salter
60 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Humphrey v. Johnson
79 S.E. 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Selph v. Selph
72 S.E. 31 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Cosnahan v. Johnston
33 S.E. 847 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 Ga. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosnahan-v-rowland-ga-1896.