Cosmos Products Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Cosmos Products Co. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 361, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3536

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 9, 1969

DocketC.D. 3769

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 361 (Cosmos Products Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cosmos Products Co. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 361, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3536 (cusc 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Mabetz, Judge:

This protest has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court:

That the merchandise marked “A” and initialed L.W. (Imp. Spec. Initials) by Import Specialist Louis Wegener (Imp. Specialist’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protest and entries enumerated above, assessed with duty at 45% ad valorem under Item 722.55, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and claimed to be properly dutiable as motors of under 1/40 horsepower, other than synchronous, at 12.5% under Item 682.25, TSUS, consists in fact of non-synchronous motors of under 1/40 horsepower which are not parts of photographic film viewers, titlers, splicers, editors, or combinations thereof.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this protest may be submitted on this stipulation, limited to the merchandise marked “A” and the claim stated, and abandoned as to all other merchandise and claims.

This stipulated statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification determined by the appropriate customs officials and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiff, to be under item 682.25, TSUS, at a rate of 12.5 percent, ad valorem as motors under 1/40 horsepower, other than synchronous.

To the extent indicated the protest is sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mabetz, Judge:

This protest has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court:

That the merchandise marked “A” and initialed L.W. (Imp. Spec. Initials) by Import Specialist Louis Wegener (Imp. Specialist’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protest and entries enumerated above, assessed with duty at 45% ad valorem under Item 722.55, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and claimed to be properly dutiable as motors of under 1/40 horsepower, other than synchronous, at 12.5% under Item 682.25, TSUS, consists in fact of non-synchronous motors of under 1/40 horsepower which are not parts of photographic film viewers, titlers, splicers, editors, or combinations thereof.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this protest may be submitted on this stipulation, limited to the merchandise marked “A” and the claim stated, and abandoned as to all other merchandise and claims.

This stipulated statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification determined by the appropriate customs officials and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiff, to be under item 682.25, TSUS, at a rate of 12.5 percent, ad valorem as motors under 1/40 horsepower, other than synchronous.

To the extent indicated the protest is sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Cust. Ct. 361, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosmos-products-co-v-united-states-cusc-1969.