Cosmos Developers, Inc. v. Margaretten & Co.
This text of 704 So. 2d 687 (Cosmos Developers, Inc. v. Margaretten & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the final judgment awarding costs and fees to co-defendant Margaretten & Co., Inc. in Cosmos Developers, Inc.’s action to foreclose on a mechanics lien.
Margaretten was a named defendant in only one count of Cosmos’s complaint. The Mitzners were named defendants in, and actively defended all four counts of the complaint. Upon granting the defendants’ motions for fees the trial court awarded the Mitzners’ counsel 96 hours as reasonably expended on the defense of the case. In contrast, the court awarded Margaretten’s counsel 225 hours as reasonably expended on the case. We hold that this award to Margaret ten was excessive in view of Margaretten’s role in the defense of Cosmos’ complaint, and the amount awarded to the other co-defendants, DiStefano Construction, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 597 So.2d 248 (Fla.1992), and is an abuse of discretion. This holding does not disturb the cost award.
We reverse the fee award and remand with instructions to reduce the number of homes awarded to Margaretten to a number no higher than the number of hours awarded to co-defendants’ counsel.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 So. 2d 687, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14579, 1997 WL 786744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosmos-developers-inc-v-margaretten-co-fladistctapp-1997.