Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Trapier

202 N.E.2d 558, 15 N.Y.2d 503, 254 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 894
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1964·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. A judgment for plaintiffs in the negligence action, sought here to be stayed, will not preclude plaintiff insurer in this action from attempting to prove that the liability, if any, of James Trapier is not within, the policy coverage because the occurrence was in reality an intentional assault (Exchange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Blazey, 19 A D 2d 682, mot. for lv. to app. den. 13 N Y 2d 601; see Prashker v. United States Guar. Co., 1 N Y 2d 584).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Wan Vookhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Trapier, 202 N.E.2d 558, 15 N.Y.2d 503, 254 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 894 (N.Y. 1964).

202 N.E.2d 558 (Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Trapier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaczmarek v. Shoffstall
119 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Argonaut Insurance v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
106 Misc. 2d 5 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)