Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Trapier
This text of 202 N.E.2d 558 (Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Trapier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. A judgment for plaintiffs in the negligence action, sought here to be stayed, will not preclude plaintiff insurer in this action from attempting to prove that the liability, if any, of James Trapier is not within, the policy coverage because the occurrence was in reality an intentional assault (Exchange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Blazey, 19 A D 2d 682, mot. for lv. to app. den. 13 N Y 2d 601; see Prashker v. United States Guar. Co., 1 N Y 2d 584).
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Wan Vookhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 N.E.2d 558, 15 N.Y.2d 503, 254 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosmopolitan-mutual-insurance-v-trapier-ny-1964.