Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Trapier
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. A judgment for plaintiffs in the negligence action, sought here to be stayed, will not preclude plaintiff insurer in this action from attempting to prove that the liability, if any, of James Trapier is not within, the policy coverage because the occurrence was in reality an intentional assault (Exchange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Blazey, 19 A D 2d 682, mot. for lv. to app. den. 13 N Y 2d 601; see Prashker v. United States Guar. Co., 1 N Y 2d 584).
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Wan Vookhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
202 N.E.2d 558 (Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Trapier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.