Cosmopolitan Land Co. v. Drane

121 So. 575, 97 Fla. 525
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 10, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *526 inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is error in the said judgment and that the same should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the case of Langley v. Irons Land & Development Co., 94 Fla. 1010, 114 So. R. 769 and authorities there cited, both in the main opinion and in the concurring opinion by Mr. Justice Strum, and it is so ordered. See also Black on Recission and Cancellation, (2nd Ed.) Sec. 419.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Ellis, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cosmopolitan Land Co. v. Drane, 121 So. 575, 97 Fla. 525 (Fla. 1929).

121 So. 575 (Cosmopolitan Land Co. v. Drane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langley v. Irons Land & Development Co.
114 So. 769 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)