Cosmopolitan Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Moon

1912 OK 561, 126 P. 756, 33 Okla. 445, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 722
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 11, 1912·No. 1866·Published

Opinion

HAYES, J.

Defendant in error brought this action in the court below to recover on a fire insurance policy. The trial in that court was to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for defendant in error, to reverse which this proceeding in error is prosecuted.

The case here presents for our consideration the same propositions presented and considered in Des Moines Insurance Co. v. Moon, ante, 126 Pac. 723, and upon the authority of that case the judgment in this case should be reversed, and the cause remanded.

TURNER, C. J., and KANE and DUNN, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cosmopolitan Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Moon, 1912 OK 561, 126 P. 756, 33 Okla. 445, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 722 (Okla. 1912).

1912 OK 561 (Cosmopolitan Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Moon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heliker-Jarvis Seminole Co. v. Lincoln
1912 OK 568 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)