Cosmo v. State

759 S.E.2d 622, 327 Ga. App. 510, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 1625, 2014 WL 2598708, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 371
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cosmo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 320 Ga. App. 397
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 11, 2014·No. A12A2469·Published

Opinion

Boggs, Judge.

In State v. Cosmo, 295 Ga. 76 (757 SE2d 819) (2014) (“Cosmo IP’), the Supreme Court reversed Division 1 of our opinion in Cosmo v. State, 320 Ga. App. 397 (739 SE2d 828) (2013) (“Cosmo 7”). We therefore vacate Division 1 of our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own with respect to that division. While sufficient evidence supports Cosmo’s conviction under OCGA § 16-12-100.2 (d) (1), he is entitled to a “retrial as a result of the trial court’s failure to charge on entrapment.” Cosmo II, 295 Ga. at 76, n. 1.

Judgment reversed.

Doyle, P. J., and Andrews, P. J., concur. Herbert E. Franklin, Jr., District Attorney, Alan C. Norton, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cosmo v. State, 759 S.E.2d 622, 327 Ga. App. 510, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 1625, 2014 WL 2598708, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 371 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

759 S.E.2d 622 (Cosmo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cosmo
757 S.E.2d 819 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)
Cosmo v. State
739 S.E.2d 828 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)