Cosher v. Ferle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cosher v. Ferle

252 A.D. 881, 300 N.Y.S. 181, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 881 (Cosher v. Ferle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cosher v. Ferle, 252 A.D. 881, 300 N.Y.S. 181, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In this negligence action the plaintiff was a passenger in the automobile owned by defendant Ferle and operated by that defendant’s husband. The automobile was operated over a depression in such manner as to cause injury to the plaintiff. On the verdict of the jury, judgment was entered against defendant Ferle and in favor of defendant The City of New York. Defendant Ferle appeals from the judgment against her, and from the order denying her motion to set the verdict aside and for a new trial, and the plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant city. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff as against defendant Ferle and [882]*882with costs to defendant The City of New York as against plaintiff. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this negligence action the plaintiff was a passenger in the automobile owned by defendant Ferle and operated by that defendant’s husband. The automobile was operated over a depression in such manner as to cause injury to the plaintiff. On the verdict of the jury, judgment was entered against defendant Ferle and in favor of defendant The City of New York. Defendant Ferle appeals from the judgment against her, and from the order denying her motion to set the verdict aside and for a new trial, and the plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant city. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff as against defendant Ferle and [882]*882with costs to defendant The City of New York as against plaintiff. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 881, 300 N.Y.S. 181, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosher-v-ferle-nyappdiv-1937.