Cosgrove v. Catania

236 A.D.2d 357, 654 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1043

This text of 236 A.D.2d 357 (Cosgrove v. Catania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cosgrove v. Catania, 236 A.D.2d 357, 654 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated January 31, 1996, as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment based upon the Statute of Limitations defense (see, Barristers Abstract Corp. v Caufield, 203 AD2d 406; Lenz v Associated Inns & Rests. Co., 833 F Supp 362, 373). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of America
833 F. Supp. 362 (S.D. New York, 1993)
Barristers Abstract Corp. v. Caulfield
203 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D.2d 357, 654 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosgrove-v-catania-nyappdiv-1997.