Cosenza v. Wong

213 A.D.2d 371, 624 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2461

This text of 213 A.D.2d 371 (Cosenza v. Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cosenza v. Wong, 213 A.D.2d 371, 624 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated October 12, 1993, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to a prior determination granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon review of the record, we find that the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Stewart v Yeshiva Nachlas Haleviym, 186 AD2d 731; Conlon v Village of Pleasant-[372]*372ville, 146 AD2d 736). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conlon v. Village of Pleasantville
146 A.D.2d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Stewart v. Haleviym
186 A.D.2d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 A.D.2d 371, 624 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosenza-v-wong-nyappdiv-1995.