Cosentino v. Elson
263 So. 2d 253, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599
Opinion
The order of the trial court, here under review, be and the same is hereby affirmed. Funds in escrow are not subject to garnishment [see: 6 Am.Jur.2d, Attachment and Garnishment, § 125; 28 Am.Jur.2d, Escrow, § 10; 38 C.J.S. Garnishment § 77c(l); Anno. 10 A.L.R. 741] except where all conditions of the escrow had been completed and the funds without dispute are due to a judgment debtor.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cosentino v. Elson, 263 So. 2d 253, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
263 So. 2d 253 (Cosentino v. Elson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nova Ins. Group v. Dept. of Ins.
606 So. 2d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Clarendon Group, Ltd. v. Lahus II, Inc.
601 So. 2d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Fla. Psc v. Pruitt, Humphress
587 So. 2d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Central National Bank v. Broadview Savings & Loan Co.
411 N.E.2d 840 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1979)