Cosby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cosby v. State

925 So. 2d 1130, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 2006 WL 941820

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 2006

DocketNo. 5D06-32

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 925 So. 2d 1130 (Cosby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cosby v. State, 925 So. 2d 1130, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 2006 WL 941820 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of the defendant, William D. Cosby’s Rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed. The defendant has filed twenty (20) appeals and petitions in this court relating to his convictions and sentences in Orange County, Circuit Court Case Numbers 2001-CF-14134, 2002-CF-2531, 2002-CF-3454, and 2002-CF-6421. He was ordered to show cause why he should not be denied further access to this court for any proceedings to further attack those convictions and sentences. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

The court has carefully reviewed the defendant’s response to the court’s order and finds no merit thereto. Accordingly, in order to preserve judicial resources, the defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings, motions, petitions or [1131]*1131other filings in this court relating to Orange County Circuit Court, Case Numbers 2001-CF-14134, 2002-CF-2531, 2002-CF-3454, and 2002-CF-6421. Any further proceedings filed in this court relating to the defendant’s convictions and sentences in these cases must be reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of The Florida Bar. The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed to not accept any further pro se pleadings from the defendant, William D. Cosby, in the above-styled cases.

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The denial of the defendant, William D. Cosby’s Rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed. The defendant has filed twenty (20) appeals and petitions in this court relating to his convictions and sentences in Orange County, Circuit Court Case Numbers 2001-CF-14134, 2002-CF-2531, 2002-CF-3454, and 2002-CF-6421. He was ordered to show cause why he should not be denied further access to this court for any proceedings to further attack those convictions and sentences. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

The court has carefully reviewed the defendant’s response to the court’s order and finds no merit thereto. Accordingly, in order to preserve judicial resources, the defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings, motions, petitions or [1131]*1131other filings in this court relating to Orange County Circuit Court, Case Numbers 2001-CF-14134, 2002-CF-2531, 2002-CF-3454, and 2002-CF-6421. Any further proceedings filed in this court relating to the defendant’s convictions and sentences in these cases must be reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of The Florida Bar. The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed to not accept any further pro se pleadings from the defendant, William D. Cosby, in the above-styled cases.

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 So. 2d 1130, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 2006 WL 941820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosby-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack