Cosby v. Clarke
This text of Cosby v. Clarke (Cosby v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6369
SHERI IMOGENE COSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR CLARKE; MS. THORNTON; MR. CHAIMBERS; MS. MILLER; OFFICER SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-5-2)
Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 8, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sheri Imogene Cosby, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Sheri Imogene Cosby appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cosby v. Clarke,
No. CA-02-5-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cosby v. Clarke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosby-v-clarke-ca4-2002.