Cosby v. Anderson

74 Ind. 600
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1881
DocketNo. 6458
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 Ind. 600 (Cosby v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cosby v. Anderson, 74 Ind. 600 (Ind. 1881).

Opinion

Bicknell, C.

This was an action on an account for goods sold and delivered, brought by Anderson & Hamilton against Cosby. Cosby admitted the account, but pleaded payment, which Anderson & Hamilton denied. The issues were tried by the court, who found for Anderson & Hamilton, one hundred dollars.

Coshy moved for a new trial for the reasons that the finding was not sustained by sufficient evidence, and was contrary to law; his motion was overruled; judgment, was rendered upon the finding. lie appealed to this court, and has assigned for error that the court erred in overruling Iils motion for a new trial.

We think there is evidence in the record tending to sustain the finding of the court below, and where that is the case, we cannot disturb the finding on a mere preponderance of evidence. Ghormley v. Young, 71 Ind. 62.

The judgment of the court below ought to be affirmed.

Per Curiam. — It is therefore ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the judgment of the court below be, and the same is hereby, in all things, affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kennedy v. Gruell
84 Ind. 133 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Swan v. Clark
80 Ind. 57 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Smith v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad
80 Ind. 233 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ind. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cosby-v-anderson-ind-1881.