Cosatime v. State
604 So. 2d 38, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9359, 1992 WL 212042
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cosatime v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8791 →
Opinion
Affirmed. As to ground two, appellant’s offense was committed prior to the effective date of chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, and therefore the issue raised in Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), review pending, Nos. 79,150, 79,204 (Fla.1992), does not apply to him. See King v. State, 585 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cosatime v. State, 604 So. 2d 38, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9359, 1992 WL 212042 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
604 So. 2d 38 (Cosatime v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. State
585 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Johnson v. State
589 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)