Coryell v. Coryell

1 N.J.L. 441
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1795·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If the arbitrators refuse a request for an adjournment founded upon sufficient reasons, and offered at a proper season, it is a sufficient ground for vacating an award ; so far the law was recognized in the case of Jessup v. Cook, ante 105. But this application was too late; it was probably made after the party had received some intimation of [386] the nature of the report, and knew it was unfavorable to him. We think the referees were right in refusing it.

Rule discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coryell v. Coryell, 1 N.J.L. 441 (N.J. 1795).

1 N.J.L. 441 (Coryell v. Coryell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.