Coryell v. Coryell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Coryell v. Coryell

1 N.J.L. 385

DecidedNovember 15, 1795

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J.L. 385 (Coryell v. Coryell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coryell v. Coryell, 1 N.J.L. 385 (N.J. 1795).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If the arbitrators refuse a request for an, adjournment founded upon sufficient reasons, and offered at a proper season, it is a sufficient ground for vacating an. award; so far the law was recognized in the case of Jessup v. Cook.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

If the arbitrators refuse a request for an, adjournment founded upon sufficient reasons, and offered at a proper season, it is a sufficient ground for vacating an. award; so far the law was recognized in the case of Jessup v. Cook.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.J.L. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coryell-v-coryell-nj-1795.