Cory v. Johnston

N.D. California

Cory v. Johnston

61 F. Supp. 1021, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2117

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California

DecidedAugust 23, 1945

DocketNo. 24972-S

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 F. Supp. 1021 (Cory v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cory v. Johnston, 61 F. Supp. 1021, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2117 (N.D. Cal. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

ST. SURE, District Judge.

Petitioner by writ of habeas corpus seeks his release from Alcatraz Penitentiary alleging that because he was sentenced to one year for escape from a federal prison, 18 U.S.C.A. § 753h, he is entitled under 18 U.S.C.A. § 753f, to choose the type of institution in which he is to serve.

Section 753f, 18 U.S.C.A., provides that all persons convicted of an offense against the United States shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General who shall designate the place of confinement, “Provided, That any sentence of imprisonment for an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of one year or less shall not be served in a penitentiary except with the defendant's consent.” (Emphasis supplied) Escape is a crime punishable “by imprisonment for not more than five years or by a fine of not more than $5,000, or both.” It is apparent from the language of 18 U.S.C.A. § 753h that petitioner does not come within the proviso of Section 753f, 18 U.S.C.A.

The other point raised by petitioner, that he is not being given the correct amount of good time allowance, is premature, for by his own computation he would not be eligible for release until May 11, 1946.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the order to show cause discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ST. SURE, District Judge.

Petitioner by writ of habeas corpus seeks his release from Alcatraz Penitentiary alleging that because he was sentenced to one year for escape from a federal prison, 18 U.S.C.A. § 753h, he is entitled under 18 U.S.C.A. § 753f, to choose the type of institution in which he is to serve.

Section 753f, 18 U.S.C.A., provides that all persons convicted of an offense against the United States shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General who shall designate the place of confinement, “Provided, That any sentence of imprisonment for an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of one year or less shall not be served in a penitentiary except with the defendant's consent.” (Emphasis supplied) Escape is a crime punishable “by imprisonment for not more than five years or by a fine of not more than $5,000, or both.” It is apparent from the language of 18 U.S.C.A. § 753h that petitioner does not come within the proviso of Section 753f, 18 U.S.C.A.

The other point raised by petitioner, that he is not being given the correct amount of good time allowance, is premature, for by his own computation he would not be eligible for release until May 11, 1946.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the order to show cause discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F. Supp. 1021, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cory-v-johnston-cand-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack