CORY MINGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 2019
Docket18-2822
StatusPublished

This text of CORY MINGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (CORY MINGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CORY MINGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CORY MINGO, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2822

[April 11, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-014060CF10A.

Cory Mingo, South Bay, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
CORY MINGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cory-mingo-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.