Corwin v. Breakstone, Grossman & Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Corwin v. Breakstone, Grossman & Co.

88 N.Y.S. 364

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.Y.S. 364 (Corwin v. Breakstone, Grossman & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corwin v. Breakstone, Grossman & Co., 88 N.Y.S. 364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempt ón the part of the defendants to get out of a contract made by them by means of a legal technicality. We are of the opinion that it was proved on the trial that the contract in question was made by the defendants, because it was sent to them mail at their place of business with a request for their signature, came back by mail signed with the same signature used by the corpora-, tion in its business dealings.

Judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempt ón the part of the defendants to get out of a contract made by them by means of a legal technicality. We are of the opinion that it was proved on the trial that the contract in question was made by the defendants, because it was sent to them mail at their place of business with a request for their signature, came back by mail signed with the same signature used by the corpora-, tion in its business dealings.

Judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 N.Y.S. 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corwin-v-breakstone-grossman-co-nyappterm-1904.