Corwin v. Breakstone, Grossman & Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Corwin v. Breakstone, Grossman & Co.

88 N.Y.S. 364

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 19, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempt ón the part of the defendants to get out of a contract made by them by means of a legal technicality. We are of the opinion that it was proved on the trial that the contract in question was made by the defendants, because it was sent to them mail at their place of business with a request for their signature, came back by mail signed with the same signature used by the corpora-, tion in its business dealings.

Judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempt ón the part of the defendants to get out of a contract made by them by means of a legal technicality. We are of the opinion that it was proved on the trial that the contract in question was made by the defendants, because it was sent to them mail at their place of business with a request for their signature, came back by mail signed with the same signature used by the corpora-, tion in its business dealings.

Judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Corwin v. Breakstone, Grossman & Co., 88 N.Y.S. 364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

88 N.Y.S. 364 (Corwin v. Breakstone, Grossman & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.