Home/New York Supreme Court/Corwein v. Hames

Corwein v. Hames

11 Johns. 76
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 11 Johns. 76 (Corwein v. Hames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corwein v. Hames, 11 Johns. 76 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The interest of the justice was too remote and contingent to be regarded in this case. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tumey v. Ohio
273 U.S. 510 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Williams v. City of Warsaw
60 Ind. 457 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Moses v. Julian
45 N.H. 52 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1863)
Ezell v. Justices of Giles County
40 Tenn. 583 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1859)
City Council v. King
15 S.C.L. 487 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1828)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Johns. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corwein-v-hames-nysupct-1814.