Corvo v. State
This text of 546 So. 2d 787 (Corvo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the points advanced by appellant, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction for armed robbery. See Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120, 1122-26 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Rodriguez v. State, 379 So.2d 657, 658 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 389 So.2d 1114 (Fla.1980); Hernandez v. State, 305 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So.2d 192 (Fla.1975); § 812.13, Fla.Stat. (1987). Accordingly, no error having been shown, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 So. 2d 787, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1749, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4196, 1989 WL 81649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corvo-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.