Corvo v. State

546 So. 2d 787, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1749, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4196, 1989 WL 81649
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 1989·No. No. 88-1243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the points advanced by appellant, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction for armed robbery. See Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120, 1122-26 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Rodriguez v. State, 379 So.2d 657, 658 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 389 So.2d 1114 (Fla.1980); Hernandez v. State, 305 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So.2d 192 (Fla.1975); § 812.13, Fla.Stat. (1987). Accordingly, no error having been shown, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corvo v. State, 546 So. 2d 787, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1749, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4196, 1989 WL 81649 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

546 So. 2d 787 (Corvo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tibbs v. Florida
457 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Hernandez v. State
305 So. 2d 211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Rodriguez v. State
379 So. 2d 657 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Tibbs v. State
397 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)