Corvin Bolden v. Officer Mark Beaupre

420 F. App'x 646
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 5, 2011·No. 10-2450·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a jury rendered a verdict for defendants on Corvin Jerrod Bolden’s 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint, he moved for post-judgment relief, arguing that the district court’s 1 excessive-force instruction was erroneous. The district court denied his motion and Bolden appeals.

After careful review, this court concludes that the instruction fairly and adequately represents the evidence and the applicable law. See Campos v. City of Blue Springs, Mo., 289 F.3d 546, 551-52 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review). This court affirms the judgment and denies the pending motion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corvin Bolden v. Officer Mark Beaupre, 420 F. App'x 646 (8th Cir. 2011).

420 F. App'x 646 (Corvin Bolden v. Officer Mark Beaupre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cheryl G. Campos v. City of Blue Springs, Missouri
289 F.3d 546 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)