Corvin Bolden v. Officer Mark Beaupre

420 F. App'x 646
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 5, 2011
Docket10-2450
StatusUnpublished

This text of 420 F. App'x 646 (Corvin Bolden v. Officer Mark Beaupre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corvin Bolden v. Officer Mark Beaupre, 420 F. App'x 646 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a jury rendered a verdict for defendants on Corvin Jerrod Bolden’s 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint, he moved for post-judgment relief, arguing that the district court’s 1 excessive-force instruction was erroneous. The district court denied his motion and Bolden appeals.

After careful review, this court concludes that the instruction fairly and adequately represents the evidence and the applicable law. See Campos v. City of Blue Springs, Mo., 289 F.3d 546, 551-52 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review). This court affirms the judgment and denies the pending motion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cheryl G. Campos v. City of Blue Springs, Missouri
289 F.3d 546 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 F. App'x 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corvin-bolden-v-officer-mark-beaupre-ca8-2011.