Corus Staal BV v. United States

2009 CIT 21
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corus Staal BV v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 493 F. Supp. 2d 1276
United States Court of International Trade·Decided March 24, 2009·No. 07-00221·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 09-21

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

____________________________________ : CORUS STAAL BV, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : Before: Judith M. Barzilay, Judge UNITED STATES AND : Court No. 07-00221 UNITES STATES DEPARTMENT : OF COMMERCE, : : Defendants, : : and : : UNITED STATES STEEL : CORPORATION AND : ARCELORMITTAL USA INC., : : Defendant-Intervenors. : : ____________________________________:

JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of Defendant U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Final

Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand filed on February 20, 2009, the court’s

opinion in this action on December 29, 2008, and all other papers filed and proceedings

conducted in this civil action, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Commerce’s use of zeroing to recalculate Plaintiff Corus Staal’s

(“Corus”) dumping margin during the subject administrative review is AFFIRMED; and it is

further Court No. 07-00221 Page 2

ORDERED that Commerce’s instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection

(“Customs”) to levy antidumping duties on entries of the subject merchandise made by Corus

during the fourth administrative review is AFFIRMED; and it is further

ORDERED that Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand concerning the issue of duty absorption is AFFIRMED.

Dated: March 24, 2009 /s/ Judith M. Barzilay New York, NY Judith M. Barzilay, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corus Staal BV v. United States, 2009 CIT 21 (cit 2009).

2009 CIT 21 (Corus Staal BV v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.