Corum v. Mendoza

Fourth Circuit

Corum v. Mendoza

670 F. App'x 790

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2016·No. No. 16-2088·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Corum appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with th.e court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corum v. Mendoza, No. 1:16-cv-00875-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Corum appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with th.e court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corum v. Mendoza, No. 1:16-cv-00875-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Corum v. Mendoza, 670 F. App'x 790 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 790 (Corum v. Mendoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related