Corum v. Corum

Missouri Court of Appeals

Corum v. Corum

264 S.W.3d 702, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1307, 2008 WL 4388496

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2008·No. WD 68817·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Corum appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to modify custody as to the parties’ minor child and sustaining Kimi Corum’s motion to modify child support.

Having carefully, considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Corum appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to modify custody as to the parties’ minor child and sustaining Kimi Corum’s motion to modify child support.

Having carefully, considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Corum v. Corum, 264 S.W.3d 702, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1307, 2008 WL 4388496 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

264 S.W.3d 702 (Corum v. Corum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.