Cortlandt v. . De Graffenried

98 N.E. 1118, 204 N.Y. 667, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 913
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified • answered in the negative on opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ. Concurs in result in memorandum: Chase, J., with whom Werner, J., concurs. Not voting: Vann, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cortlandt v. . De Graffenried, 98 N.E. 1118, 204 N.Y. 667, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 913 (N.Y. 1912).

98 N.E. 1118 (Cortlandt v. . De Graffenried) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kindler v. Kindler
60 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Strebler v. Wolf
152 Misc. 859 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)