Cortlandt v. . De Graffenried

98 N.E. 1118, 204 N.Y. 667, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 913
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 27, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 98 N.E. 1118 (Cortlandt v. . De Graffenried) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cortlandt v. . De Graffenried, 98 N.E. 1118, 204 N.Y. 667, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 913 (N.Y. 1912).

Opinions

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified • answered in the negative on opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ. Concurs in result in memorandum: Chase, J., with whom Werner, J., concurs. Not voting: Vann, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kindler v. Kindler
60 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Strebler v. Wolf
152 Misc. 859 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 N.E. 1118, 204 N.Y. 667, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortlandt-v-de-graffenried-ny-1912.