Cortland County Mutual Insurance v. Lathrop

New York Supreme Court

Cortland County Mutual Insurance v. Lathrop

2 How. Pr. 146

DecidedApril 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 146 (Cortland County Mutual Insurance v. Lathrop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cortland County Mutual Insurance v. Lathrop, 2 How. Pr. 146 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

Set aside the inquest in each cause, with $10 costs of one motion, as both motions might have been included in one set of papers, the plaintiffs and attorneys being the same, and the facts the same. (2 Howard, 38.) The ground of the decision was, that the plaintiffs’ attorney should either have returned the pleas or have given notice, immediately after their service, that he should treat them as a nullity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beardsley, Justice.

Set aside the inquest in each cause, with $10 costs of one motion, as both motions might have been included in one set of papers, the plaintiffs and attorneys being the same, and the facts the same. (2 Howard, 38.) The ground of the decision was, that the plaintiffs’ attorney should either have returned the pleas or have given notice, immediately after their service, that he should treat them as a nullity.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortland-county-mutual-insurance-v-lathrop-nysupct-1846.