Cortinas v. General Motors Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cortinas v. General Motors Corp.

862 S.W.2d 518, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1592, 1993 WL 402942

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 1993·No. No. 63805·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Rudy T. Cortinas, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Rela[519]*519tions Commission denying his claim for Workers’ Compensation Benefits.

The order of the administrative agency is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The order of the administrative agency is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Rudy T. Cortinas, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Rela[519]*519tions Commission denying his claim for Workers’ Compensation Benefits.

The order of the administrative agency is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The order of the administrative agency is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cortinas v. General Motors Corp., 862 S.W.2d 518, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1592, 1993 WL 402942 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

862 S.W.2d 518 (Cortinas v. General Motors Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.