Cortijo v. Ward
This text of 158 A.D.2d 345 (Cortijo v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
"It is well settled that a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons” where the decision is made in good faith and not for a constitutionally impermissible purpose. (Matter of York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, 761.)
Petitioner bears the burden of presenting evidence to show that the Commissioner acted in bad faith. (Haberman v Codd, 48 AD2d 505.) Petitioner was not given any reason for her termination. She speculates that she was terminated either due to her performance on the shooting range or psychological reasons. Neither reason would support a finding of bad faith even where the agency is in receipt of conflicting opinions. (Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 NY2d 637.) "A mere belief of bad faith does not satisfy the requirement, or warrant a [346]*346hearing.” (D’Aiuto v Department of Water Resources, 51 AD2d 700, 701.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D.2d 345, 551 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortijo-v-ward-nyappdiv-1990.