Cortijo v. New York City Hous. Auth.
This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 3894 (Cortijo v. New York City Hous. Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Cortijo v New York City Hous. Auth. |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 03894 |
| Decided on May 31, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 31, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.
6712 303825/15
v
New York City Housing Authority, Respondent-Appellant.
Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., New York (Linda M. Brown of counsel), for appellant.
Pena & Kahn, PLLC, Bronx (Diane Welch Bando of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Llinet M. Rosado, J.), entered on or about August 14, 2017, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
Defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MAY 31, 2018
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 NY Slip Op 3894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortijo-v-new-york-city-hous-auth-nyappdiv-2018.