Cortez v. Holiday Concord Village Management Co.
This text of 259 A.D.2d 586 (Cortez v. Holiday Concord Village Management Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), dated August 14, 1998, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there exist triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) as to the presence and duration of snow and ice at the site of the accident prior to its occurrence. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D.2d 586, 686 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortez-v-holiday-concord-village-management-co-nyappdiv-1999.