Cortes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cortes v. State

642 So. 2d 608, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8652, 1994 WL 479167

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cortes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 670 So. 2d 119 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 7, 1994·No. No. 94-1388·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Luis Felipe Cortes appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The sentencing order imposes a legal sentence. Although there is a discrepancy as to which of the two pending cases would carry the mandatory minimum sentence of 3 years, it is abundantly clear that defendant agreed to a 12-year sentence with a concurrent 3-year mandatory minimum, and that is what he received.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Luis Felipe Cortes appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The sentencing order imposes a legal sentence. Although there is a discrepancy as to which of the two pending cases would carry the mandatory minimum sentence of 3 years, it is abundantly clear that defendant agreed to a 12-year sentence with a concurrent 3-year mandatory minimum, and that is what he received.

Cortes v. State, 642 So. 2d 608, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8652, 1994 WL 479167 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

642 So. 2d 608 (Cortes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.