Cortes v. Madison Sq. Garden Co.

2020 NY Slip Op 677, 179 A.D.3d 620, 114 N.Y.S.3d 877
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 2020
Docket10921 157421/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 677 (Cortes v. Madison Sq. Garden Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cortes v. Madison Sq. Garden Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 677, 179 A.D.3d 620, 114 N.Y.S.3d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Cortes v Madison Sq. Garden Co. (2020 NY Slip Op 00677)
Cortes v Madison Sq. Garden Co.
2020 NY Slip Op 00677
Decided on January 30, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 30, 2020
Richter, J.P., Gische, Mazzarelli, Gesmer, JJ.

10921 157421/13

[*1] Eric Cortes, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent,

v

The Madison Square Garden Company also known as Madison Square Garden, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants.


Nguyen Leftt, P.C., New York (Stephen D. Chakwin, Jr. of counsel, for appellant.

Cullen & Dykman LLP, New York (Christopher Ruggiero of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered July 2, 2018, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff established prima facie entitlement to partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim, through his testimony that he fell when a loose piece of masonite on which the ladder was placed "kicked out" from under him (see Klein v City of New York, 89 NY2d 833 [1996]).

In opposition, defendants raised an issue of fact as to whether plaintiff's negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident (see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d 280, 290 [2003]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them to be unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 30, 2020

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.
803 N.E.2d 757 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
Klein v. City of New York
675 N.E.2d 458 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 677, 179 A.D.3d 620, 114 N.Y.S.3d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortes-v-madison-sq-garden-co-nyappdiv-2020.