Cortes v. Kern County Superintendent of Schools

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 28, 2019·No. 1:18-cv-00909·Unknown

Opinion

ANGELICA CORTES, INDIVIDUALLY, Case No.: 1:18-cv-00909-JLO-JLT GUARDIAN AD LITEM GUSTAVO ORDER CLOSING THE CASE CORTES, AND GUSTAVO

Plaintiff, v.

SCHOOLS and Does, Defendant.

The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with prejudice. (Doc. 29) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41 permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order “by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 79), it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 27, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cortes v. Kern County Superintendent of Schools, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

Cortes v. Kern County Superintendent of Schools (Cortes v. Kern County Superintendent of Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)