Cortes v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance
557 A.2d 1001, 115 N.J. 190, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 54
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 232 N.J.Super. 519 (1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cortes v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance, 557 A.2d 1001, 115 N.J. 190, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 54 (N.J. 1989).
557 A.2d 1001 (Cortes v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
YURIEL MONDRAGON CALIX VS. A2Z UNIVERSAL LANDSCAPING, (DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017
Stancil v. ACE USA
12 A.3d 223 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2011)
Basil v. Wolf
935 A.2d 1154 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2007)
Flick v. PMA Ins. Co.
928 A.2d 54 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)