Cortes Co. v. Tannhauser

18 F. 667, 21 Blatchf. 552, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2454
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 F. 667 (Cortes Co. v. Tannhauser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cortes Co. v. Tannhauser, 18 F. 667, 21 Blatchf. 552, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2454 (circtsdny 1883).

Opinion

Wallace, J.

The defendants cannot take the testimony of these witnesses in a foreign country, tinder section 863 of the Bevised Statutes. That section only applies to the taking of depositions within the United States. All the officers named, before whom depositions may be taken, are those of courts of some of the states of this country, except notaries public, and it is not to be assumed that notaries public of foreign countries wore intended to be delegated with a power which, in the case of higher officials, is confined to those of our own country. The proper course is by commission. The cases seem to be such as to render an oral examination of the witnesses expedient upon the execution of the commission. As the rest of the proofs have been so taken, the defendants are especially entitled to insist upon the same course on the examination of their foreign witnesses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ktistakis v. The Liberian S.S. Star
169 F. Supp. 820 (E.D. Virginia, 1958)
Aldrich v. Campbell
97 F. 663 (Ninth Circuit, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. 667, 21 Blatchf. 552, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortes-co-v-tannhauser-circtsdny-1883.