Cortelyou's Appeal

102 Pa. 576, 1883 Pa. LEXIS 101
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 19, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 102 Pa. 576 (Cortelyou's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cortelyou's Appeal, 102 Pa. 576, 1883 Pa. LEXIS 101 (Pa. 1883).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered March 19th 1883.

Per Curiam.

The evidence of this alleged contract is too doubtful to justify a decree of specific performance. There certainly was evidence to sustain the facts found by the Master [581]*581and confirmed by the court, that the agreement was entered into under a misapprehension of the parties, in regard to the quantity of land intended to be included in the contract. The serious and substantial doubt found to exist, is 'sufficient to stay the hand of a chancellor, and to justify him in refusing a decree of specific performance, which is not of right, but of judicial grace.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindsay v. Rose
6 Pa. D. & C. 325 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Whiteside v. Winans
29 Pa. Super. 244 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Kirkpatrick v. Pettis
103 N.W. 956 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Pa. 576, 1883 Pa. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortelyous-appeal-pa-1883.