Cortelyou v. Lowe

111 F. 1005, 49 C.C.A. 671, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4459
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 14, 1901·No. No. 113·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause comes here on appeal from an order granting preliminary injunction. The case upon which the order was granted is in its facts practically identical with the one which was before the circuit court of appeals of the Sixth circuit in Heaton Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co., 25 C. C. A. 267, 77 Fed. 288, 35 L. R. A. 728. Wo fully agree with the opinion of the court in that case, and think the decision should control the case at bar. The order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cortelyou v. Lowe, 111 F. 1005, 49 C.C.A. 671, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4459 (2d Cir. 1901).

111 F. 1005 (Cortelyou v. Lowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. Olmsted
203 F. 493 (Seventh Circuit, 1913)
Automatic Pencil Sharpener Co. v. Goldsmith Bros.
190 F. 205 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1911)
Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Standard Brewery
174 F. 252 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois, 1909)
Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.
154 F. 58 (Second Circuit, 1907)
Cortelyou v. Charles E. Johnson & Co.
145 F. 933 (Second Circuit, 1906)
Hartman v. John D. Park & Sons Co.
145 F. 358 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky, 1906)
Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. Platt
142 F. 606 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois, 1906)
Cortelyou v. Charles Eneu Johnson & Co.
138 F. 110 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1905)
Platt v. National Ass'n of Retail Druggists
1 Ill. Cir. Ct. 1 (Illinois Circuit Court, 1905)
Brodrick Copygraph Co. v. Mayhew
131 F. 92 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin, 1904)
Rupp & Wittgenfeld Co. v. Elliott
131 F. 730 (Sixth Circuit, 1904)
National Phonograph Co. v. Schlegel
128 F. 733 (Eighth Circuit, 1904)
A. B. Dick Co. v. Roper
126 F. 966 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1903)
Brodrick Copygraph Co. v. Roper
124 F. 1019 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1903)
Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Fair
123 F. 424 (Seventh Circuit, 1903)
Edison Phonograph Co. v. Pike
116 F. 863 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1902)