Cortelyou v. Carter's Ink Co.

118 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5244

This text of 118 F. 1022 (Cortelyou v. Carter's Ink Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cortelyou v. Carter's Ink Co., 118 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5244 (circtsdny 1902).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Complainant may take a restraining order in the general form of the injunction in the Lowe Case, 1. e. closely restricted to sales advertisements calculated to induce persons who bought Neostyle machines under contract as to the kind of ink to be used to violate their contract. The papers seem to indicate that the statements of defendant’s selling agent were not suggested by defendant or its officers; but it is, of course, responsible for the statements, as well as the sale, to the extent, at least, that complainant may protect itself by injunction against the acts of some further over-zealous agent. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cortelyou-v-carters-ink-co-circtsdny-1902.