Cortazar v. Cortazar

171 N.Y.S.3d 835, 2022 NY Slip Op 04897

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: August 10, 2022
• Docket: Index No. 705029/16
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cortazar v Cortazar (2022 NY Slip Op 04897)

Cortazar v Cortazar

2022 NY Slip Op 04897

Decided on August 10, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 10, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

2020-02642
(Index No. 705029/16)

[*1]Vincent Cortazar, etc., respondent,

v

James Cortazar, etc., et al., appellants.

Courtney A. Bihn, New York, NY, for appellants.

White, Cirrito, Nally & Lynch, LLP, Hempstead, NY (Christopher M. Lynch of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Timothy J. Dufficy, J.), dated August 5, 2019. The order granted the plaintiff's unopposed application for an award of attorneys' fees and disbursements to the extent of awarding him attorneys' fees in the sum of $85,000 and disbursements in the sum of $6,922.21.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The defendants failed to submit papers to the Supreme Court in opposition to the plaintiff's application for an award of attorneys' fees and disbursements, and the application was granted on default. Since the order appealed from was entered upon the defendants' default, the appeal must be dismissed (see CPLR 5511; J.F.J. Fuel, Inc. v Tran Camp Contr. Corp., 105 AD3d 908; DiNozzi v DiNozzi, 74 AD3d 866).

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., RIVERA, CHAMBERS and DOWLING, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court