Corsten v. Avis Rent a Car, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corsten v. Avis Rent a Car, Inc.

261 A.D.2d 500, 688 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5432

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D.2d 500 (Corsten v. Avis Rent a Car, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corsten v. Avis Rent a Car, Inc., 261 A.D.2d 500, 688 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a class ac[501]*501tion commenced by the plaintiff Antonins J. Corsten on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated who rented a vehicle from the defendants Avis Rent A Car, Inc., and Avis Rent A Car System, Inc., to recover damages for alleged improper refueling charges, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated July 21, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

All of the plaintiff’s claims concerning refueling charges imposed by the defendants either have been previously rejected by the courts or are without merit (see, Lewis v Hertz Corp., 181 AD2d 493; Super Glue Corp. v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 159 AD2d 68). S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a class ac[501]*501tion commenced by the plaintiff Antonins J. Corsten on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated who rented a vehicle from the defendants Avis Rent A Car, Inc., and Avis Rent A Car System, Inc., to recover damages for alleged improper refueling charges, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated July 21, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

All of the plaintiff’s claims concerning refueling charges imposed by the defendants either have been previously rejected by the courts or are without merit (see, Lewis v Hertz Corp., 181 AD2d 493; Super Glue Corp. v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 159 AD2d 68). S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D.2d 500, 688 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corsten-v-avis-rent-a-car-inc-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack