Corson v. Mattox

382 F. App'x 288
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 10, 2010·No. 10-1246·Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David C. Corson filed a civil complaint asserting claims arising under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2006), who recommended denying relief and notified Corson of his right to file objections to the report and recommendation. Instead, Corson filed a notice of appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Corson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corson v. Mattox, 382 F. App'x 288 (4th Cir. 2010).

382 F. App'x 288 (Corson v. Mattox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)