Corso v. Padmanabhan

796 So. 2d 1211, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14159, 2001 WL 1186871
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 2001
DocketNo. 1D98-1597
StatusPublished

This text of 796 So. 2d 1211 (Corso v. Padmanabhan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corso v. Padmanabhan, 796 So. 2d 1211, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14159, 2001 WL 1186871 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. The trial court committed reversible error by entering a final judgment against appellant, who did not receive the order permitting defense counsel to withdraw, motion for default, default order, motion to set the case for trial, or order setting the case for trial. See, e.g., Williams v. Adams, 636 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). See also Bermuda Atl. Line Ltd. v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 622 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Seinsheimer Cos. v. Cobia Point Condo. Ass’n, 616 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Bridges v. Bridges, 520 So.2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

ERVIN, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridges v. Bridges
520 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Seinsheimer Companies v. Cobia Pt. Condo. Association
616 So. 2d 1136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Bermuda Atlantic Line Ltd. v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
622 So. 2d 489 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Williams v. Adams
636 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
796 So. 2d 1211, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14159, 2001 WL 1186871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corso-v-padmanabhan-fladistctapp-2001.