Corso v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.

Alexandria County Circuit Court

Corso v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.

25 Va. Cir. 429, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 282

CourtAlexandria County Circuit Court

DecidedNovember 7, 1991

DocketCase No. (Law) CL910607

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Va. Cir. 429 (Corso v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alexandria County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corso v. Nationwide Mutual Ins., 25 Va. Cir. 429, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 282 (Va. Super. Ct. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE DONALD H. KENT

The plaintiff is seeking to recover medical payment benefits under an insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff’s parents. The defendant failed to provide the statutorily required coverage, and the parties agree that the plaintiff is entitled to the coverage under Section 38.2-2201 of the Code. The issue presented is whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover $20,000.00 or $4,000.00. The case comes before the Court on joint motions for summary judgment.

The Court finds that S 38.2-2201 requires minimum coverage of $2,000.00 if the defendant fails to provide the statutorily required coverage. The Court cannot rewrite the policy for the parties and speculate as to what amount of coverage they might wish to purchase. Since two vehicles were insured, the minimum coverage may be stacked to provide a total of $4,000.00 in medical payment benefits.

Mr. Weinstein should prepare an order providing for summary judgment in the amount of $4,000.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE DONALD H. KENT

The plaintiff is seeking to recover medical payment benefits under an insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff’s parents. The defendant failed to provide the statutorily required coverage, and the parties agree that the plaintiff is entitled to the coverage under Section 38.2-2201 of the Code. The issue presented is whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover $20,000.00 or $4,000.00. The case comes before the Court on joint motions for summary judgment.

The Court finds that S 38.2-2201 requires minimum coverage of $2,000.00 if the defendant fails to provide the statutorily required coverage. The Court cannot rewrite the policy for the parties and speculate as to what amount of coverage they might wish to purchase. Since two vehicles were insured, the minimum coverage may be stacked to provide a total of $4,000.00 in medical payment benefits.

Mr. Weinstein should prepare an order providing for summary judgment in the amount of $4,000.00.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Va. Cir. 429, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corso-v-nationwide-mutual-ins-vaccalexandria-1991.