Corso v. Nasser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corso v. Nasser

42 A.D.2d 822, 345 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 822 (Corso v. Nasser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corso v. Nasser, 42 A.D.2d 822, 345 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof and as modified affirmed with costs to appellants. Memorandum : Plaintiffs, suing on behalf of themselves and all other members of the City of Corning Fire Department, appeal from an order which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action in the complaint. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third cause of action was denied and defendants have not appealed. The first cause of action for money damages was properly dismissed. The second cause of action for a declaration as to the proper disposition to be made of the funds received by the fiscal officer of the City of Corning pursuant to the provisions of sections 553 and 554 of the Insurance Law, which provide that such funds are for the use and benefit of the Fire Department, sufficiently alleges a failure by defendants to so use the funds. A complaint in an action for a declaratory judgment will not be dismissed where, as in this case, it is shown that the controversy is real and that a declaratory judgment would be useful. (Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N Y 2d 317, 334; Rockland Light & Power Co. v. City of New York, 289 N. Y. 45, 50-51.) (Appeal from part of order of Steuben Special Term partially dismissing complaint.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Witmer, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof and as modified affirmed with costs to appellants. Memorandum : Plaintiffs, suing on behalf of themselves and all other members of the City of Corning Fire Department, appeal from an order which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action in the complaint. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third cause of action was denied and defendants have not appealed. The first cause of action for money damages was properly dismissed. The second cause of action for a declaration as to the proper disposition to be made of the funds received by the fiscal officer of the City of Corning pursuant to the provisions of sections 553 and 554 of the Insurance Law, which provide that such funds are for the use and benefit of the Fire Department, sufficiently alleges a failure by defendants to so use the funds. A complaint in an action for a declaratory judgment will not be dismissed where, as in this case, it is shown that the controversy is real and that a declaratory judgment would be useful. (Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N Y 2d 317, 334; Rockland Light & Power Co. v. City of New York, 289 N. Y. 45, 50-51.) (Appeal from part of order of Steuben Special Term partially dismissing complaint.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Witmer, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 822, 345 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corso-v-nasser-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack