Corsetti v. Commonwealth
411 N.E.2d 466, 381 Mass. 778, 1980 Mass. LEXIS 1344
Opinion
The Commonwealth has filed a motion to expand the record to include the fact that the grand jury with which we are concerned is no longer in service. G. L. c. 277, § 1. We allow the motion. Thus the dispute between the parties as to whether Corsetti must appear before the grand jury to testify is moot. See generally Blake v. Massachusetts Parole Bd., 369 Mass. 701, 708 (1976). The matter is to be remanded to the Superior Court for such further proceedings as now may be required.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corsetti v. Commonwealth, 411 N.E.2d 466, 381 Mass. 778, 1980 Mass. LEXIS 1344 (Mass. 1980).
411 N.E.2d 466 (Corsetti v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Raczkowski
475 N.E.2d 417 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1985)
Commonwealth v. Corsetti
438 N.E.2d 805 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1982)