Corsetti v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Corsetti v. Commonwealth

411 N.E.2d 466, 381 Mass. 778, 1980 Mass. LEXIS 1344

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 411 N.E.2d 466 (Corsetti v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corsetti v. Commonwealth, 411 N.E.2d 466, 381 Mass. 778, 1980 Mass. LEXIS 1344 (Mass. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

The Commonwealth has filed a motion to expand the record to include the fact that the grand jury with which we are concerned is no longer in service. G. L. c. 277, § 1. We allow the motion. Thus the dispute between the parties as to whether Corsetti must appear before the grand jury to testify is moot. See generally Blake v. Massachusetts Parole Bd., 369 Mass. 701, 708 (1976). The matter is to be remanded to the Superior Court for such further proceedings as now may be required.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Commonwealth has filed a motion to expand the record to include the fact that the grand jury with which we are concerned is no longer in service. G. L. c. 277, § 1. We allow the motion. Thus the dispute between the parties as to whether Corsetti must appear before the grand jury to testify is moot. See generally Blake v. Massachusetts Parole Bd., 369 Mass. 701, 708 (1976). The matter is to be remanded to the Superior Court for such further proceedings as now may be required.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 N.E.2d 466, 381 Mass. 778, 1980 Mass. LEXIS 1344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corsetti-v-commonwealth-mass-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack