Corsbie v. Corsbie
137 So. 3d 1194, 2014 WL 1493551, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5541
Opinion
We agree with the appellant that it was error for the trial court to have denied the motion to amend with prejudice. An amendment to the complaint identifying the plaintiff as the personal representative and limiting the claims to conversion would relate back and should have been allowed. [1195]*1195See Eisen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. 126 So.3d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s order denying the motion to amend with prejudice.
Reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corsbie v. Corsbie, 137 So. 3d 1194, 2014 WL 1493551, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5541 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
137 So. 3d 1194 (Corsbie v. Corsbie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Eisen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
126 So. 3d 323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)