Corry Mency v. Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 2016
Docket15-3904
StatusPublished

This text of Corry Mency v. Department of Corrections (Corry Mency v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corry Mency v. Department of Corrections, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CORRY MENCY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-3904

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed June 7, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Corry Mency, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Christopher P. Arnold and Daniel A. Johnson, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Corry Mency v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corry-mency-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2016.