Corrigan v. Village of Wellsville
This text of 263 A.D. 1056 (Corrigan v. Village of Wellsville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that there is no negligence or nuisance shown. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action to recover damage to property caused by negligent work on street and sewer. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present —■ Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCum, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 1056, 34 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corrigan-v-village-of-wellsville-nyappdiv-1942.